[Sks-devel] nokeyserver annotation

[Vincent Breitmoser]

An invalid notation might not be rejected by a client (is it critical
marked?). Is there a reference for this behavior in RFC and tested on
various implementations?

I still don't understand. It's not the notation that is invalid, it's
the certificate itself. It's my key, as long as we don't assume that an
attacker can forge certificates for my key that check out
cryptographically (in which case we have other problems!), I hope every
implementation won't accept non-verifying self-certificates into its
keyring.

- V

[Vincent Breitmoser]

Ping? :)

This thread sort of died down, but I'd like to know if this is
conceptually acceptable and would have a chance of being accepted if
someone implemented it.

- V

[Vincent Breitmoser]

Pretty please? :)

- V

Post by Vincent Breitmoser
Ping? :)
This thread sort of died down, but I'd like to know if this is
conceptually acceptable and would have a chance of being accepted if
someone implemented it.
- V
_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

[Vincent Breitmoser]

No? :(

- V

Post by Vincent Breitmoser
Pretty please? :)
- V

Post by Vincent Breitmoser
Ping? :)
This thread sort of died down, but I'd like to know if this is
conceptually acceptable and would have a chance of being accepted if
someone implemented it.
- V
_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

_______________________________________________
Sks-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel